News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Ethanol's environmental advantage over petrol confirmed by US study 

Ethanol's environmental advantage over petrol confirmed by US study

30 Oct, 2008 11:26 AM
The Illinois Corn Growers Association (ICGA), US, has unveiled the results of two studies this week that confirm ethanol can grow substantially without affecting the food or feed sectors' supply of corn and that the carbon footprint of ethanol is less than that of gasoline.

The studies' authors, Ross Korves, economic policy analyst at ProExporter Network, and Dr Steffen Mueller, principal research economist at the University of Illinois' Chicago's Energy Resources Center, joined the ICGA at a press conference in Chicago.

"The conclusions of these two scientific studies are historic," said Rob Elliott, vice president of the ICGA.

"Amid the long and sometimes heated debate between ethanol proponents and detractors, these studies indicate that modern ethanol plants have a superior carbon footprint and net energy benefit when compared to gasoline refineries.

"And, the Korves study provides compelling data that ethanol production can grow substantially at no risk to food supplies."

Mueller's study looked at the global warming and land use impact of corn ethanol produced at the Illinois River Energy ethanol plant – which is a modern, natural gas fueled facility - on a full life-cycle basis.

"We found conclusively that the global warming impact of the modern ethanol plant is 40pc lower than that of gasoline.

This is a sizable reduction from numbers currently being used by public agencies and in the public debate," Mueller said.

"The study also documents the significant net energy benefits of ethanol when compared to gasoline.

And, additional opportunities exist to expand that margin even more through technological improvements and on farm changes in corn production that reduce green house gas emissions."

A second study, Meeting US Energy Needs 2016–2030, authored by Korves, examined the technology revolution that could see the average corn yield per acre increase from the 155 bushels today to 289 bushels in the next 20 years.

Korves found that with current technology there would be enough corn to increase production of ethanol to 33 billion gallons by 2030 while still meeting increased future demand of corn for exports and livestock feed.

The two studies were done for the Illinois Corn Growers Association and can be viewed at http://www.ilcorn.org/internal.ph p?subj=research&menu=resources&ba nner=resources.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Prof Ray Kearney has shown it would reduce death from respiratory disease by more than the road toll by adding just 10% ethanol, let alone the illness and work time lost due to the heavy particulates that can be easily halved by 10% ethanol. 10% ethanol blend is a moral, social, health and economic imperative.
Posted by JB, 31/10/2008 6:36:31 AM
Sounds like the good consultants have delivered what the client wanted to read. There is too much vested interest in this to accept anything but the findings of fully independent studies.
Posted by cynic, 31/10/2008 8:47:34 AM
JB, I think you should have a look at the recent, June 08, CSIRO report on 'Evaluating the Health Impacts of Ethanol Blend Petrol' found at http://www.environment.gov.au/atmosphere/fuelquality/publica tions/pubs/ethanol-health-impacts.pdf

It concludes 'Overall the study estimates a marginal health cost savings in the four major Australian cities from widespread use of E5 and E10. However, this saving will be eroded over time as new vehicles, with improved emission control technology, enter the Australian fleet.' I do not think grain ethanol advocates can hang their hat on Prof. Kearney's report in the face of the more recent CSIRO findings

Posted by Two Bob, 31/10/2008 2:34:03 PM
Spot on cynic. As well, these corn ethanol reports and comments out of the USA are based on farming conditions very different to here in Australia and so have limited application in any arguments put forward by the grain ethanol lobbyists here. Iowa does not have the variability of harvests as we have here in NSW. They have a larger surplus of grain to export and so grain prices do not reach import parity as they do in the Eastern States and so on. Our irrigation water is going to become more valuable so we are talking dryland crops in an increasingly variable climate to supply the feedstock for an ethanol industry. Does anybody think that average dryland yields will double in the next 20 years as one of these studies suggests for corn in the USA?
Posted by Two Bob, 31/10/2008 2:48:47 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should there be mandatory labelling laws to advise consumers if food contains ingredients from genetically modified (GM) crops?

Yes
(86.9%)

No
(11.1%)

Undecided
(1.9%)

Total Votes: 1507
Poll Date: 27 October, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...