Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Your Say 
 Irrigators fight back against Qld water charges 

Irrigators fight back against Qld water charges

An impassioned plea for the Queensland State Government to address its "illogical water pricing policy" in the wake of the ongoing drought has been made by the St George irrigation community.

Angry irrigators met at Scott Armstrong's Cooinda Cotton shed earlier this week, climaxing with a ritual burning of a SunWater bill that seeks further payment of his Part A charges.

It's an increasingly contentious issue that was first raised during the winter months when Water Minister Craig Wallace, speaking in State Parliament, likened the Part A charges to renting a telephone line at home.

With the mood of the meeting underscoring "something has to be done" and that "doing nothing" was no longer an option, Mr Armstrong called for irrigation community support from schemes at Emerald, the Downs and Bundaberg.

Local Nationals Member, Howard Hobbs and Shadow Minister for Natural Resources and Water Ray Hopper are demanding Minister Wallace meet with the affected irrigators.

On the day, it was left to Mr Armstrong to lay bare his frustrations by detailing how he was at his wit's end – both emotionally and financially – in championing not only the survival of his own farm but also the wellbeing of both the local irrigation community and the town of St George.

He said the actions of the State Labor Government and its "illogical water pricing policy " were "ripping the heart" out of the district.

Mr Armstrong castigated the Bligh Government for refusing to accept the financial realities of the drought, labelling the Part A charges as akin to a drought tax.

"And they are demanding this payment on threat of cutting supply on any remaining water balance we may have," he said.

"This is nothing short of government sponsored extortion of farmers in the worst drought ever recorded."

The State Government fees are charged for maintaining infrastructure.

Irrigators contend they maintain their own infrastructure with their own resources, arguing that making "drought-busted" farmers pay for State Government infrastructure is both unfair and irrational.

What do you think?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The dams and channels have been at St George for a long time and have been paid off through water charges and income tax.

Part A tariff is based on a farmer's water allocation and is applied quarterly in advance.

With water allocations at St George currently set at less than 20%, irrigators are paying for water they won't receive.

There is not enough water to grow a cotton crop.

There might be enough water to grow alternative crops if it rains.

Last year, some irrigators at St George didn't plant a cotton crop and some planted part of a full crop. Cotton prices were low and water supply was iffy.

Profits were down in previous seasons.

The cost of seed, labour, fertiliser and diesel have risen.

Cotton farmers probably wouldn't have any spare cash left.

If a company was selling natural gas and its well ran dry, it wouldn't be able to keep charging customers for gas. It would bear the financial loss.

People pay rent for a telephone line at home but they are getting a service.

Irrigators are paying alocation charges for water they won't receive.

It's an illogical price policy in the worst drought recorded in Queensland.

Irrigators are being ripped off and I don't know how they can find huge anounts of money every 3 months to pay for water that won't arrive.

Posted by Diskmasher on 27/10/2007 8:18:49 PM
Your Say
Make us laugh, make us cry, make us wiser than we were. Get those issues off your chest and put them on our Your Say blog.

21/11/2008 | AWI's new board can only succeed in old battles by fighting in new ways.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...