The State Government has finally put an end to the contentious issue of rural leasehold rents, capping increases to a maximum of 20pc a year.
This is a far cry better than facing rental increases in line with huge spikes in property valuations of the last couple of years.
In some regions those valuations have increased by 2500pc.
If rents had been increased by the same amount, it would have broken the back of many rural leaseholders.
In credit to AgForce, they have succeeded in managing the issue by negotiating a rental freeze for the past two years until the Government came to accept a more acceptable method of calculating rents.
And while a 20pc increase is better than 2500pc, it is still a significant cost impost facing farmers.
The State Opposition argues - and its a point that was pushed by AgForce during the long and tenuous negotiation with the Government - that rentals should be capped in line with inflation.
After all, the Government is receiving a higher income without providing an extra service.
What do you think?