In a win for the staff of Queensland's Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, they have finally succeeded in publicising the woodlands research by former staffer Dr Bill Burrows.
Many Queensland landholders suffering the uncheckable consequences of vegetation thickening will recall with disdain the way the State Government treated Dr Burrows. The pre-eminent expert on woodlands ecology – respected worldwide for research into vegetation thickening – was gagged by the Government from talking to the media during the land-clearing debate of 2002-04.
The reason for the shabby treatment was that Dr Burrows' 40 years of research directly contradicted many of the environmental and economic arguments put by Premier Peter Beattie, then Primary Industries Minister Henry Palaszczuk, and former Natural Resources Minister Stephen Robertson.
Dr Burrows and a team of DPI scientists and economists had found that without the use of dozer and chain, which was banned under the State Government's tree-clearing laws, it would be unviable and unaffordable for graziers to control native vegetation as it thickened with regrowth.
The thickening process, it was shown, threatened the future of some grass and bird species, as well as the economic viability of the grazing sector. It was estimated in 2003 that the net present cost to Queensland of unchecked vegetation thickening over a 25-year period would be $900 million – a far cry from the State's $150m assistance package.
The report was revealed to the public only after an extensive investigation by Queensland Country Life. Dr Burrows and his team had been ordered to destroy all copies of the report.
So it was with some sense of irony then to find that the minders in Brisbane cleared for release a DPI&F press statement highlighting the contribution of the now-retired Dr Burrows to current woodlands research and acknowledging many of his findings.
While the deficiencies of the land-clearing laws are not the making of current ministers for DPI and NRW, Tim Mulherin and Craig Wallace respectively, they now have the opportunity to remedy the situation.
They have two immediate options: Either drop the dozer and chain restriction for controlling thickening, which is unlikely; or convince their colleagues in Federal Labor not to sign to the Kyoto protocol.
The DPI&F press release talks about the massive carbon sink provided by regrowth, but it is a forgotten fact of the land-clearing debate that the Federal Government deliberately omitted the impact of thickening from its greenhouse accounting when negotiating Australia's Kyoto targets. If that protocol is ratified, it would lock Queensland farmers out of selling the carbon their regrowth has absorbed and of recouping some of the lost income not compensated for by the State or Federal Governments.
Equally, they and Coalition MPs must lobby the Federal Coalition that when it receives its carbon-trading report later this month it includes in any carbon market that's created a baseline year that predates Queensland's clearing bans. The Commonwealth has been quick to boast about how it is meeting its Kyoto targets – it's time to repay graziers who have delivered those results with a workable carbon market.